Criminal Girls with 20 Pearls – A Little Birdie at DOJ Contacts Mo'Kelly
February 6th, 2010
Mo’Kelly found out today that he has a loyal reader at the Department of Justice. You just never know who is reading The Mo’Kelly Report. He/She suggests that those individuals who would like Judge Natalia Combs-Greene investigated or her judicial conduct probed, here is the path:
Public Integrity Section
Criminal Division
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530
202.514.2000
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/pin/
[Stay tuned...the new mrmokelly.com website is coming to you in 2010. Set your browsers now.]
The Mo’Kelly Report is an entertainment journal with a political slant; published weekly at The Huffington Post and www.eurweb.com. It is meant to inform, infuse and incite meaningful discourse…as well as entertain. The Mo’Kelly Report is syndicated by Blogburst. For more Mo’Kelly, http://www.mrmokelly.com. Mo’Kelly can be reached at Mo@mrmokelly.com and he welcomes all commentary.
Subscribe to The Mo’Kelly Report HERE
Posted in 
Tags: 7 Responses to “Criminal Girls with 20 Pearls – A Little Birdie at DOJ Contacts Mo'Kelly”
Leave a Reply
Saturday and Sunday nights from 8pm - 9pm PDT on XM 244.
Custom Mr. Mo'Kelly Search
Mo' I know that the BAM supporters say that this is about some women who are jealous of BAM. This is about money where it goes and who gets it. I will write the Department of Justice. To my knowledge Alpha Kappa Alpha was the only organization that asked for donations to Haiti be written to them. AKA would then direct the funds to the Red Cross. Why? Writng a check to AKA is the same as writing a check to BAM. Why would the sorority want to become a third party in providing relief to Haiti? If the Department of Justice doesn't see something fishy as this request came from an organization that has not filed tax reports and refuses to share their finacial records, then who will protect people ? It was interesting that the judge made reference to the lack of proof from the plaintiffs that there was financial damage when she hadn't looked at the books. The judge looked at all the documentation and she fails to see anything worth investigating? She didn't think her connection with a defendant was relevant? I just hope that the DOJ can make me and others believe that Judge Green demonstrated an impartial view of this case. Her decision was for the best interest of the public.
I told you the Feds eat this stuff up.
Walt, yes you did.
Mo, did you ever comment on the fact that the "racist" who appeared at a rally with the gun was, in fact, an African-American, and that the photo had been altered to make him appear white?
I believe we had quite a discussion on it, with your insisting that he was racist.
Jack, I don't know what you're talking about here, respectfully. Context please?
Mo'…A post on the WI site said that writing letters to the DOJ will hurt the case!!!!How can a letter expressing a concern or asking a question create harm? The post said your source may be setting us up for an even bigger fall. Sounds like some BAM stuff trying to create a diversion to me. Which makes me wonder if everything is okay why would they be concerned? What harm can be done to the WI8 now?
Not true. Ignore it Von.